|

|
EDER 677 - Telecommunications in
Education
|
|
Educational Changes
|
Social / Administrative - "Privatization
and Market Approach to Education" |
|
Educational change is not a new phenomena. Recently, however, this
has been a regular practice. The funding that was once guaranteed
has now been cut short. Accountability seems to be the catch phrase
for the school districts, schools, and the professionals that work
here. Schools are now responsible for their own budget and many are
scrambling to stay out of the red. Parents are also a catalyst for
this shift in education. They have been screaming for a long time
for less rigidity in the system and have been lobbying the government
to make this change. All these events when put together are the reasons
why privatization and the market approach to education have taken
shape.
Kuehn
(2002, director of BCTF research and technology, comments that
this shift in education is due to policy changes in the new provincial
government in BC. This policy change has allowed school boards to
create a company to carry out business activities that would not be
possible as a public body or that would expose the school district
to financial liability (Kuehn,
2002). They are also allow to sell their services to overseas
schools as well as handing out BC high school certification to students
who attend these schools. International students have always been
a hot commodity. Now, they are even more popular as ever. Many districts
have moved quickly to bring in international students, who pay high
tuition and top up the district budget. In 2000- 2001, districts charged
an average tuition of $10,000. On average, they spent $5,000 per student,
leaving an average profit of $5,000 (Kuehn,
2002).
Distributed learning which relatively less know is "competing
fiercely" with each other for new students. The Gold Trail district,
for example, is offering to pay parents $750 per student for learning
resources and $250 for Internet connections. The Nechako E-bus has
advertised that it provides a computer and Internet links to families
who sign up with the program. Some of the Regional Distance Education
Schools have reported that students in their programs have moved to
other programs that offer more incentives to sign up (Kuehn,
2002). The reason school districts are pursuing this is to raise
money as funding is determined by the number of students enrolled.
With student loads often 50 or more per distributed-learning teacher,
some districts see making a "profit" on those students,
even after giving a portion of the public funding to private individuals
for learning resources, computers, and Internet links (Kuehn,
2002). With this deregulation, "a district can recruit students
from other distributed-education programs or from among students who
would otherwise be attending regular classes in their own or other
school districts" (Kuehn,
2002).
Enrolling in a distributed Masters program has given me insight to
how things are done as well as how things should be done. The knowledge
that I have gained has given me control to what is now a confusing
time in education. The entrepreneurial approach to business has always
excited me and knowing that the government is leaning this way has
spurned many ideas in my head. There are many ways to attract students
and our district has started many ventures to meet these students'
needs. We have always had a strong international student program.
Presently, we are now running a hockey academy with a fixed timetable
for all the high school so that any student can attend. A rugby academy
is in the works for next year. These are exciting times for me because
I will be a leader in this shift in education. My graduate studies
alone has given me a stronger insight in this change and for this
I am indebted. |
|
|
|