Discussion Topic: Telecommunication Modes (CMC Modes)

Preface
 

As described in the slides, there are many modes of telecommunication. The mode of delivery, though, is not the most important aspect in course design. Rather it is the "quality and design of instruction which makes learning more effective" (Richard Clark).

There has been a shift on how online courses are designed in recent times. Tapscott (as cited in Reily, 2001) outlines 8 shift that he believes instructor and students need to make if they want a more powerful and effective learning paradigm. These shifts are from linear to hypermedia learning, from instruction to construction and discovery, from teacher-centered to learner-centered education, from absorbing material to learning how to navigate and how to learn, from school to lifelong learning, from one size fits all to customized learning, from learning as torture to learning as fun, and from teacher as a transmitter to a teacher as a facilitator.

These shifts all relate to the learning theories we covered in earlier discussion.

Gardner's Multiple Intelligence - different types of intelligences need different methods of curriculum design

Constructivist theory - focus more on structured activity where the student is taking responsibility for the contruction of their learning

Andragogy (self - directed learning theory) - learners need to know why they are learning the material, material should be learned experiencially, and problem solved, and material should have immediate value

Questions   

How do we use the different telecommunication modes to promote a "community of active learners?"

If you were to redesign this course, explain what tools you would choose? Why?

Resource  

Link1 - editorial on the different telecommunication modes

Link 2 - BC's dynamic e-learning community

Link 3 - an analysis of TechBC university

Link 4 - Issues and Resources for web based learning

Summary
My topic for the discussion thread was on telecommunication modes.  This discussion ran from Thursday to Wednesday.  Unfortunately, it also fell on a Thanksgiving weekend as well as on the week that our major paper was due.  As a result participation was minimal.  As well, the questions were not as challenging as I hoped it to be.  The task of posting the question using a HTML format was a laborious chore as some of you might have noticed.  I posted it 3 times and did not  get the "look" that I wanted.  The limiting factor for WebCT was that previous messages cannot be deleted.  However, as a learning community I felt those who did participate had some interesting comments.  

The questions I posed were:  How do we use the different telecommunication modes to promote a "community of active learners?  If you were to redesign this course, explain what tools you would choose? Why?

Everyone agreed that the tools used for the course mainly WebCT and Centra really complemented each other.  Iris commented, "I like the time lag…I can think through my answers before posting them, so I feel they have better quality / substance to them, than speaking off the cuff as I do in real time classes."  She goes on to talk about Centra, "I like this format because it allows some real time interaction. For me, it makes my classmates more 'real' than printed words."  Most of us like the fact that we can use the asynchronous mode on our own time.  The synchronous mode helped us with clarification, promoted collaboration, and added real time communication.  

As for the different types of telecommunication modes to create a community of active learners, some people were for using all types of modes to give each learner an opportunity to succeed.  Other felt that too many modes distracted from the quality of the course.  The confusion of having to go to various sites to get into the telecommunication modes was an issue for many of us.  Jody comments were:  "If possible, it would be nice to have a single point of entry - or portal - to the EDER program and all of the courses in which we are registered. With one single login, you could have access to marks, courses, fees, research tools, and the list goes on."  

Crystal mentioned the theory of "meta-cognition."  

This term is often simply defined as "thinking about thinking."   In actuality, defining meta-cognition is not that simple. Although the term has been part of the vocabulary of educational psychologists for the last couple of decades, and the concept for as long as humans have been able to reflect on their cognitive experiences, there is much debate over exactly what metacognition is. One reason for this confusion is the fact that there are several terms currently used to describe the same basic phenomenon (e.g., self-regulation, executive control), or an aspect of that phenomenon (e.g., meta-memory), and these terms are often used interchangeably in the literature. (Livingston, 1997)

She say that "anyone can access as many postings, articles and posted projects as are listed, but unless one takes the time to really read it in depth, think about it, all one has done is recite words on a page.  Active learner is not measurable by how much they've read or posted, but by what they've come to understand, what they've twisted through their mind repeatedly until they’ve come to own the knowledge."  The problem is how do we measure this?  

Motivation to learn was also mentioned as a key ingredient in the setup of a community of active learners.  This undoubtedly is not a factor for graduate level students because these people choose to come back to learn and to apply their learning to their work situations. 

All in all, this was a positive learning experience.  There were some things I would have done differently.  One would have been to pose more challenging questions.  The other would have be to intercede when things were not going as smoothly as I wanted it to be.  However, for an inexperienced mediator, it was a judgment call because of the mitigating circumstances with a holiday and a major paper in the works, it was hard to decide if people were not challenged or just busy.